Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/09/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Richard Coutant wrote:
> Somehow I managed to accidentally delete and send the last message all
> at once...What I was saying was that earlier tonight I was asked to look
> at a bag of Leica stuff that my friend Arthur had inherited - a IIIa
> number 261667
261667 is a 1937 IIIa.
in pristine condition, with absolutely sweet shutter, even
> the 1 sec humming along, and an Elmar in much different condition than
> the camera, tarnished, pitted, peeling but good glass - an older one
> with the 3.5/4.5/6.3/9/12.5/18 apertures. As best as I could see with a
> magnifier the lens number is 124167.
124167 would be a pre-'30 lens, if I read the tables correctly.
Hove says:
"From 1931 in standardised ("O") version many different versions before and
during wartime. European aperture scale, last version international scale.
Some
versions with finer spacing of focussing scale."
I told him that the only
> explanation I could think of was that the lens was a later wartime or
> postwar item with the finish problems typical of that era. I have no
> lens number resources - does anybody know how old this is? In the bag
> was also a 9cm/f4 Elmar number 165147
165147 would seem to be about 1933 (Hove 7th edition p272).
in perfect condition with both
> front and rear metal caps, and an E. Leitz New York complete illustrated
> price list from March 1939. Along with a bunch of Kodak filters and an
> Argus brochure(!) What a pretty set. I told him to buy some film.
>
Do others agree with the above?
Absolutely agree, these are still usable cameras and live if they are used.
Peter Dzwig