Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/03/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Isn't BW400CN a C-41 film? I seem to recall people feeling that those films (color neg) actually do quite will if you rate them lower. Less grain, still get good tones. Why not just rate BW400CN at 200 instead of 400? Daniel B. D. Colen wrote: > If 100 iso is high enough, Ken, go for it - but expect a smoother, less > contrasty look than Tri-X... > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of > Kenneth Frazier > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 11:34 PM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: RE: [Leica] Fuji Neopan Acros 100? > > > bdcolen@earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) wrote: > > >>When shooting film it was my >>standard film for bright sunlight. Standard processing, and I scanned >>it. No problems scanning. I liked it. Very fine grain. Nice tonality. > > > Thanks, B. D. > > My reason for asking, I neglected to mention, is that Monday and Tuesday > I'm shooting outside and will be able to use a slower speed > film....slower than my usual BW400CN. > > Ken >