[Leica] daly PAWs 7

[brad at bradbrad.com (brad daly)]

On 22 Feb 2005, at 3:36 PM, B. D. Colen wrote:

> But - they all could have been shot, and perhaps better, with a 28, 24
> or 21 - they really didn't need the Xpan, which in this case leaves 
> what
> amounts to too much dead space.

i kept thinking "28, 28, 28" the whole time i was shooting these.  it 
would have worked a lot better to get in the people and their signs, 
since people holding signs are generally vertically oriented.

FWIW, i have a few more up on the fuji rangefinder website:

http://tinyurl.com/655ns

i'm like using the Xpan because movies are one of the first things that 
got me interested in photography.  i'm interested in *having* to 
compose in a wide rectangle, even when regular 2:3 format would be 
easier.  obviously, it doesn't always work.

> BTW - I have to say that the third one, which I really like, really
> enrages me - but it's the mother who gets me teed off, not you. :-)

yeah, i felt much the same way.  i'm not opposed to seeing kids "used" 
for propoganda per se, but i do think using kids at an anti-abortion 
rally is over the line.  there was a lot of imagery--mutilated fetuses, 
etc--that could really be psychologically damaging to a lot of kids.  i 
don't think it would bother me, though, to see kids holding signs at a 
democratic or republican rally.

thanks for the comments.

--brad

--
brad daly       
brad@bradbrad.com
http://www.bradbrad.com

What Would Bill Hicks Say?

All photographs are accurate. None of them is the truth.
        --Richard Avedon