Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Doomed digital
From: masonster at gmail.com (David Mason)
Date: Sat Jan 22 12:17:15 2005
References: <200501221434.AA4193845384@cshore.com> <3.0.6.32.20050122150455.0082ea70@pop.mail.yahoo.ca>

I agree with Dan. Unless there is something wrong with it resale price
does not a doomed camera make.


On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:04:55 -0500, Dan C <bladman99@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> Why is your G3 doomed?   Is it broken?   Were you happy with the photos it
> took when you bought it?  Can it not still take the same quality of photos
> today?
> 
> -dan c.
> 
> At 02:34 PM 22-01-05 -0500, dnygr wrote:
> >My Canon G3 is already doomed and I have had it for only two years. It is
> passe. D10s are passe, D20s will soon be. I would only get pennies on the
> dollar for my G3. Digital photo equipment has about as much resell value as
> an old Mac, if a buyer can be found. My M6 retains value. Digital is here
> to stay, but for how long, in what form? Maybe some day it will even be as
> quaint as platinum printing. Given how quickly technology is marching that
> may not be too long from now. Just something to think about.
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
>

In reply to: Message from dnygr at cshore.com (dnygr) ([Leica] Doomed digital)
Message from bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C) ([Leica] Doomed digital)