[Leica] More RD-1 Samples

[jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith)]

Maybe I'm looking at only the bad images. These look pretty lousy to me.
I think it explains why the camera did not come out in March as it was
first projected. 

Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA


-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Greg
Locke
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 8:12 PM
To: 'Leica Users Group'
Subject: RE: [Leica] More RD-1 Samples

One of my gripes with digital or maybe my Nikon D100 (Which I have be
using
professionally of 2 years now) is that the highlights blow out (no tonal
graduation)

This does not seem to be as much of a problem based on these pix.

Greg Locke
St. John's, Newfoundland

      --- SOUND SYMPOSIUM XII --
International Festival of New Music and Art 
Daily photo coverage at 
http://blog.greglocke.com
July 8 - 18, 2004
St. John's, Newfoundland 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+locke=straylight.ca@leica-users.org 
> [mailto:lug-bounces+locke=straylight.ca@leica-users.org] On 
> Behalf Of Feli di Giorgio
> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 10:05 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] More RD-1 Samples
> 
> On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 17:19, Dan C wrote:
> > These are much better than the first batch, but there still 
> seems to 
> > be a softness to them.  Perhaps I'm expecting too much from 
> a 6mp sensor.
> > 
> > -dan c.
> 
> I think you are correct. 6MP is nowhere in the ballpark with 
> a good 35mm neg scan from Leica glass.
> 
> 
> Feli
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information