Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Why a digital M
From: george at imagist.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Tue Jul 13 11:05:45 2004
 
Don Dory7/13/04

>Likewise, I am not sure even Nikon's F model
>can hold up to professional use decade after decade as a properly
>maintained M will.

Yes. They can and do. I've got two of them which just keep going flawlessly.

Fond regards,

G e o r g e   L o t t e r m o s e r,    imagist?

<?>Peace<?>   <?>Harmony<?>  <?>Stewardship<?>

Presenting effective messages in beautiful ways
                                     since 1975
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
web                               <www.imagist.com>
eMail                        george@imagist.com
voice                              262 241 9375 
fax                                262 241 9398 
                      Lotter Moser & Associates
10050 N Port Washington Rd  -  Mequon, WI 53092
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Why a digital M)
 In reply to: Message from dorysrus at mindspring.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Why a digital M)