Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/06/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Digilux - was Tina and Her Computer: Lightening Strike!
From: ljkapner at cox.net (Leonard J Kapner)
Date: Sun Jun 27 06:17:21 2004

Peter, if I'm that close I worry about ME, but only momentarily...

Len

-- 

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+ljkapner=cox.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+ljkapner=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Peter
Dzwig
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2004 3:36 AM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Digilux - was Tina and Her Computer: Lightening Strike!

I used - years ago - to work on the properties of GaAs.

As far as I can recall sitting here thinking about it, GaAs might be more 
resistant than Si - wider band gap - but not impervious. Basically putting a

huge bolt of energy into any semiconductor/semi-insulator will cause a surge
of 
current, whose properties may or may not be ameliorated by device in which
it 
sits; but totally resistant, no.

But basically Len, if you're that close I worry about the Digilux ;-)

Peter

Leonard J Kapner wrote:

> This is another aspect of electro-magnetic pulse (EMP) phenomenon. Someone
> wrote a science-fiction book about it a decade or so ago. Nuclear weapon
air
> bursts at strategic locations knocked out all unhardened defense and
> communication sites, rendering us suddenly deaf, dumb and blind and unable
> to operate our vehicles. Not to mention dead, too... I understand that
> gallium arsenide circuits are resistant to EMP rendering them inoperable;
> not so with conventional silicon.
> 
> I wonder if the CPU in my Digilux 2 is made of gallium arsenide? :-)
> 
> Len
> 


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] Digilux - was Tina and Her Computer: Lightening Strike!)