Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/03/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] PAW
From: george at imagist.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Sat Mar 27 12:01:16 2004
 
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 13:20:02 -0500
>> To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org>
>> Subject: [Leica] PAW
>> 
>> http://www.leica-gallery.net/bdcolen/image-63132.html
>> 
>> Alt 1 http://www.leica-gallery.net/bdcolen/image-63133.html
>> Alt 2 http://www.leica-gallery.net/bdcolen/image-63134.html
>> 
>> All shot with Leica E1 and 21.... ;-)

Something weird about refering to the lenses on these digicams in terms of 35mm equiv. I'd appreciate knowing actual lens specs rather than equivs because then I can actually gain knowledge about chip size, depth, etc. For nearly 50 years I've been able to discuss actual focal length regardless of format - can't we keep speaking in real focal length? Anyone else feel similar?

Fond regards,

G e o r g e   L o t t e r m o s e r,    imagist?

<?>Peace<?>   <?>Harmony<?>  <?>Stewardship<?>

Presenting effective messages in beautiful ways
                                     since 1975
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
web	                          <www.imagist.com>
eMail                        george@imagist.com
voice                              262 241 9375 
fax                                262 241 9398 
                      Lotter Moser & Associates
10050 N Port Washington Rd  -  Mequon, WI 53092
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Replies: Reply from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] PAW)
Reply from sam at osheaven.net (Sam) ([Leica] PAW)
 In reply to: Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] PAW)