Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] TriX at 800
From: DKhong <dkhong@pacific.net.sg>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 06:01:30 +0800
References: <r02010100-1032-E4468EB6503611D8AE4D000393D465D8@[10.0.1.8]> <4C3A6571-5041-11D8-85DD-0050E42E6E0B@shaw.ca>
 
I have heard that chromogenic films like XP2 is captured better by scanners 
compared to silver based films.  Don't know how true this is.

Dan K.

At 04:50 AM 1/27/04, you wrote:
>What are you scanning with? My Minolta Scan Dual II chokes on Tri-X and 
>spews out blotchy scans. Some weird reaction of the scanner res and the 
>grain pattern in Tri-X. Everything else scans fine. Too bad Tri-X is my 
>B&W film of choice!
>
>John Collier
>
>On Jan 26, 2004, at 12:36 PM, Adam Bridge wrote:
>
>>I did some playing with Tri-X at 800 and 1600.
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html







    


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to: Message from Adam Bridge <abridge@mac.com> ([Leica] TriX at 800)
Message from John Collier <jbcollier@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] TriX at 800)