Re: [Leica] No digital comments?

["Jack Herron" <jherron@theriver.com>]

BR,
    Your argument is logically equivalent to "All 35mm cameras use 35mm
film, so what difference does it make which of them we discuss".
    The difference is solely that this a LEICA list, not a camera is a
camera list.  And Karen wasn't advocating an elimination of the discussion,
simply a moderation in line with the purposes of the group.

Jack Herron
8118 E. 20th St.
Tucson, AZ 85710
520 885-6933
- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Afterswift@aol.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 1:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] No digital comments?


>
> In a message dated 8/13/03 12:40:14 PM, jerryleh@pacbell.net writes:
>
> <<  I do believe that Karen is objecting
> to the NON-LEICA content of the digital contributions. >>
>
> As everyone knows, I'm not a digital zealot. As they say, I can take it or
> leave it alone. When someone mentions digital in a way that intersects my
> experience, and I can make a contribution to the dialog, I'll say a few
words about
> it. As I pointed out, brand now makes little difference in digital
cameras.
> Leica is marketing a back for the R9. I have no idea who makes it for
them. So,
> as someone pointed out, it's legitimate for us to peruse the subject from
time
> to time. The prosumer compacts are alike under the magnesium, so what
> difference does it make which of them we discuss. I could slap a Leica red
dot logo
> on my Oly 5050 and come up with the same results as tho I used a Digilux.
The
> only difference is that the 5050 uses the remarkable xD cards.
>
> br
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html