Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] squabbling over digitial vs. film.
From: Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 10:57:56 -0700
References: <5140433.1060100052064.JavaMail.nobody@statler.psp.pas.earthlink.net>
 
At 9:14 AM -0700 8/5/03, Douglas Herr wrote:
>The endless squabbling over digital vs. film  seems pointless to me. 
>Each has its strengths and weaknesses; digital is 'good enough' for 
>some purposes.  For those who feel that settling for 'good enough' 
>cheapens the craft, remember that 35mm doesn't provide the image 
>quality of 4x5 or medium format but is good enough for many 
>purposes.  Good enough is just what it means: good enough.  It's all 
>we need.
>
>Doug Herr

Bravo!

- -- 
    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to: Message from Douglas Herr <telyt@earthlink.net> ([Leica] squabbling over digitial vs. film.)