Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Tom
Does a 280/2.8 count? they've had one of those for along time, first one
real nice and current one is part of their Modular system.
Gene
"tOM Trottier"
<Tom@Abacurial.com> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Sent by: cc:
owner-leica-users@mejac.palo Subject: RE: [Leica] M camera NOW R camera ?
-alto.ca.us
07/30/2003 02:46 PM
Please respond to
leica-users
On Wednesday, July 30, 2003 at 9:00
Randy Jensen <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> wrote:
> Have you noticed how reliable XD-11s are? That's the body the R4 is
"based
> on." When I worked in a camera store and someone brought one in 'broken'
it
> was almost always the battery. I'm just glad Leica didn't go to Olympus
for
> help. Can you imagine Leicas based on an OM-10 (don't wind that camera
> yet - make sure it's finished its exposure or it's GONE).
Ah, but when will Leica have a 250/2 lens....
tOM
- ---- Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur ----
,__@ tOM Trottier +1 613 860-6633 fax:+1-775-307-4133
_-\_<, 758 Albert St.,Ottawa ON Canada K1R 7V8
(*)/'(*) ICQ:57647974 N45.412 W75.714
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a
little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor
safety." -- Benjamin Franklin
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too
much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.
- -Thomas Jefferson 1743-1826)
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html