Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
At 9:16 AM -0700 4/28/03, Henning Wulff wrote:
>At 9:11 AM -0700 4/28/03, Richard F. Man wrote:
>>
>>I suppose. I like to see what I can get away with though. I have a
>>number of pictures (with Leica glass and others) that don't flare
>>(as much), but I guess they are more covered by tree leaves, clouds
>>etc.
>
>The _exact_ angle of incidence is very important. You might find
>that you can get away with shooting directly into midday sun if you
>more 5 degrees away.
Sorry. I _meant_ to say that "You might find that you can get away
with shooting directly into the midday sun if you moved your angle of
view 5 degrees away. This is of course hard to determine with a RF
without really a lot of tests.
>On the other hand, the midday sun has an incredible light output
>compared to when the sun is lower in the sky and is part of a
>composition with the horizon in it.
- --
* Henning J. Wulff
/|\ Wulff Photography & Design
/###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
|[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html