Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/09/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 28mm vs 24
From: "Steve LeHuray" <icommag@toad.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 14:33:57 -0500

> on 9/16/01 12:49 PM, Dan Post at dpost@triad.rr.com wrote:
> 
>> I was wondering if the 28 might be a better choice for a 'normal ' wide
>> angle in place of the 35, and perhaps if the household budget allows it, a
>> 21 for the really wide stuff.

John Brownlow replies:
>
> the 28 is my 'normal' wide lens now for sure
>
> I have been shooting with a 25 and 24 for wider stuff still. The 24 is like
> a wider 28 more than the 28 is like a wider 35, if you see what I mean.


I will ditto that about the 28, especially since I got the new 28/2.0 a few
months ago. Last week I got a Voightlander 21/4.0, very nice lens. Now I am
wondering if the 28/21 combination will become my working lens kit.

sl
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html