Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] an ethical question....
From: "Joe Codispoti" <joecodi@thegrid.net>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 13:37:15 -0700
References: <NABBLIJOIFAICKBIEPJJIEBAJLAA.darkroom@ix.netcom.com>

From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>

> Are you insinuating that no one else can take pictures at the wedding if
the
> bride and groom signed a contract saying such?  The bride and groom
signing
> a contract as such (and I would doubt they would) does not obligate people
> who are not party to the contract!  Now, the bride and groom may ask you
to
> not take pictures, and if you do, may ask you to leave...but they wouldn't
> have many friends if they didn't let friends take pictures.
>
> I can't imagine anyone asking for such an obligation in the first place,
> much less anyone agreeing to it!


I attended a wedding where the official "photographer" was confiscating all
cameras and removing the film before returning them the gests if he saw them
taking photos. What a jerk!
The bride had signed the contract containing such a clause without being
aware of the consequences. She tried to protest the photographer's behavior
to which he replied: "you signed the contract".

Joe Codispoti

Replies: Reply from "Tom Schofield" <tdschofield@email.msn.com> (Re: [Leica] an ethical question....)
In reply to: Message from "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com> (RE: [Leica] an ethical question....)