Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/12/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Ansel Adams/John Wimberley WAS Mapplethorpe, highquailty porn
From: "Henning J. Wulff" <henningw@archiphoto.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 17:14:31 -0800
References: <B6512805.63DA%john@pinkheadedbug.com> <4.1.20001204134741.01822820@xsj02.sjs.agilent.com>
 
At 1:48 PM -0800 12/4/00, Jim Brick wrote:
>At 11:12 AM 12/4/00 -0800, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>>
>>Jeeze!! does " Ansel Adams" and "pornography" belong in the same paragraph?
>>Let's ask Susan Sontag!!
>>
>>mark rabiner
>
>
>Ha! Should Susan Sontag and Ansel Adams be used in the same paragraph?
>
>;-)
>
>Jim

Now there's a road well trampled!

- -- 
    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
In reply to: Message from Johnny Deadman <john@pinkheadedbug.com> (Re: [Leica] Ansel Adams/John Wimberley WAS Mapplethorpe, high quailty porn)
Message from Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com> ([Leica] Re: Ansel Adams/John Wimberley WAS Mapplethorpe, highquailty porn)