Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Henning J. Wulff wrote:
> >Also, have you ever REALLY compared a MF enlargement to a 35mm enlargement,
> >of the same film for 'sharpness'?
Hi Henning and everyone,
The larger negative of 120 film has a hidden advantage beyond
sharpness. Sometimes I find that the picture requires severe cropping.
Indeed, there maybe more than one picture in a 120 negative!! Because of
the larger size, cropping is a real world situation. With 35mm, cropping
in one direction is possible, seldom in two, as than the image is really
small and the limits of enlargement are reached sooner.
However, I feel that my best shots are the ones that need no, or
minimal cropping, the ones that seem to 'pop' out of the viewfinder
at the instant of exposure. It's a definite feeling, like 'that's
a keeper', maybe only one out of 36. When I develop the film, there
it is. I don't make contact sheets, I know the shots that I want to
print. Every photographer seems to develop (!) their own way of
working, and my approach is not unique.
Cheers,
Rich Lahrson
tripspud@wenet.net