Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/03/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
> THIS MESSAGE IS IN MIME FORMAT. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
- --MS_Mac_OE_3003163050_671387_MIME_Part
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
In response to recent LUG thread regarding the durability of the Olympus
cameras,
I came across this test data and the overall score of a similarly-tested
Leica R6.
I think the results might surprise a few of the OM bashers! No flame start
intended,
just some info which is also Leica relevant. (BTW, the R6 test was rated 88
and
OM4T 87).
http://www.teamti.com/Ziv/OM/OM-Article-4tipro.htm
- --MS_Mac_OE_3003163050_671387_MIME_Part
Content-type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>[Leica] R6 & OM test</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR=3D"#FFFFFF">
In response to recent LUG thread regarding the durability of the Olympus ca=
meras, <BR>
I came across this test data and the overall score of a similarly-tested Le=
ica R6.<BR>
I think the results might surprise a few of the OM bashers! No flame start =
intended,<BR>
just some info which is also Leica relevant. (BTW, the R6 test was ra=
ted 88 and <BR>
OM4T 87).<BR>
<BR>
<FONT COLOR=3D"#000080"> </FON=
T><FONT COLOR=3D"#0000FF">http://www.teamti.com/Ziv/OM/OM-Article-4tipro.htm</=
FONT>
</BODY>
</HTML>
- --MS_Mac_OE_3003163050_671387_MIME_Part--