Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/06/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
The LTM Summaron 35 3.5 and 2.8 are optically identical. The M was
available with and without RF goggles. The LTM was without goggles.
I own a 3.5 version in LTM and find it to be OK but not outstanding. The
2.8 version is reputed to be much better, but I have never used one. My
wife has an M3 with a RF Summicron and it is OUTSTANDING!
Cheers!
kw
>I'm thinking about buying a 35 for my M3, naturally I'll need one with
>goggles.
>I'm wondering if anyone has any experience with the 35 summarons 2.8/3.5
>how do
>the perform? compared to a summicron. Also were the screw mount summarons the
>same as the M series, if so I think i can save even more cash. The other
>option is buying a 50 summicron and waiting till I have another body before i
>get a 35.
>btw, i currently own a 90 collaps elmar
>
>--
>Michael Garmisa <elmar@webreach.com>
>17-Jun-98 23:58:08
- ----
Ken Wilcox Carolyn's Personal Touch Portraits
LHSA, MEA, LAW preferred---> <wilcox@umcc.umich.edu>
<kwilcox@gfn.org>