Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/04/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Martin V. Howard wrote:
>>The problem with "nosus humungus" is not that the nose is big, but
rather that it is *disproportionally* large (in relationship to the
rest of the face). Consequently, a nose ought to be more
disproportionally large with a 35mm from 19 inches away, than with a
50mm near-focus from 19 inches away. Right?<<
Sounds reasonable to me (but I'm no optical expert)! But on a related
topic, I recently read (in a Leica catalog, I think) that a 50mm lens
most closely approximates the "angle of view" of the human eye (which
I guess refers to the 50mm lens's 45 degree angle of view); yet I also
recall reading years ago that what human eyes see as the relationship
among objects, near to far, is approximated by an 85mm lens. Can any
LUG member who HAS some optical expertise confirm that latter notion?
Art Peterson