Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/03/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
At 30 Mar 1998 17:51:17 -0800, Francesco Sanfilippo <fls@5senses.com> wrote:
> Anyone have experience with this brand NEW color neg film?
What new? I suspect that `Superia' is a noise word which may be discarded
without affecting the parse.
From Fuji's web-page
at http://www.fujifilm.com/home/faqsfact/amfilmfq.htm:
* What is the Difference Between Superia & Super HQ 35mm Films?
* Fujicolor Superia is Fujifilm's Current Premium Film, Whereas The
Super HQ is Manufactured on a Larger Basis For Chain Stores and
Sold At A Lower Cost. Although Super HQ is a Lower Grade Film,
Both Films Are Of Fujifilm's High Standard Quality and Are Backed
By Fuji Photo Film.
Nice capitalization, eh?
(My translation: every last one of the nominally-`amateur' Fuji films
one might actually consider using will be labelled `Superia' once the
distribution channels have flushed awhile.)
...but note just how useful this silly Fuji webpage is: the same FAQ answers
such burning questions as:
* If I Buy Fujicolor 35mm Film, Do I Have To Use It In a Fuji 35mm
Camera?
> How does it compare to Kodak Royal Gold 100 and previous
> Fuji Reala 100?
Try it. See what you think yourself. I expect is *is* the previous
Reala, after some label reengineering. The Reala I've gotten from B&H
has said `Superia' on the box for the better part of a year. I've been
ignoring it -- assumed it was just some non-US-market nonsense I didn't
need to care about.