Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/01/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
At 01:38 PM 1/21/98 -0500, you wrote:
> I would suggest, again, that if the time difference were significant,
> photographically speaking (regardless of whatever the tested number of
> milliseconds is), the historical photojournalistic record would not be
> so preponderantly full of photographs taken with Nikon SLR cameras.
And Leicas, and Canons, and Rolleis and Speed Graphics. Great news photos
don't always need quick reflexes.
==========
Eric Welch
St. Joseph, MO
http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch
The distinction between past, present and future is only an illusion, even
if a stubborn one. - Albert Einstein