Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/11/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
The R3 uses silver batteries.
kw
>On Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 02:18:35 -0500 (EST) ChipZHZ@aol.com wrote:
>
>>R3- First Leica electronic based on Minolta XE-1. Spot metering and
>>averaging. 35,600 black,4,250,chrome, 25,000 MOT. Both common. Mine
>>developed meter problems shortly after purchase. Manual or auto
>>(apeture priority?) Rather low resale value.
>
>The above raised my curiosity. In the KEH Camera Holiday '97 catalog, the
>R3MOT's in similar condition are less than the R3's. I do recall the Minolta
>XE-1 vintage 1975 or 1976 and at the time thought it was a very nice camera.
>My questions are:
>
>1) Why might the R3MOT be selling for less than the R3 (at KEH anyway)?
>2) Is it foolish to buy an R3 or R3MOT for mechanical reasons (is it not as
>durable or mechanically reliable as other R's)?
>3) The mercury battery problem. I assume the R3 family took mercury cells.
>Does Wien make an air cell that replaces the mercury cell?
>4) Regarding the R3MOT; it appears there is a winder and motor etc.
>what would be a better choice?
>5) Would choosing a camera body from the R3 family be a decent way
>to get into the R system of lenses?
>6) Finally, I assume the R3 and all subsequent R bodies use 3 cam lenses
>to take advantage all possible exposure automation. Is this true?
>
>Any thoughts, opinions or information you care to share on the subject would
>be most appreciated.
>
>Regards,
>
>Larry Zaks
- ----
Ken Wilcox Carolyn's Personal Touch Portraits
LHSA, MEA, LAW preferred---> <wilcox@umcc.umich.edu>
<kwilcox@genesee.freenet.org>