Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/10/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re[2]: Gandy for President
From: seungmin@luxmail.luxcom.com
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 97 08:20:43 PST
 
     Hi,
     
      I have had so many of the SL's and the SL2's so far with no problems 
     at all while I have had quite a few different kinds of problems with 
     my M's.  I have not seen any SL or SL2 with a missing chunk of leather 
     at all while I have seen a lot of them.  The R and Flex bodies are all 
     Leica no matter what.  Again would you, stick-with-the-M-only people, 
     not consider your second child your child?  Please stop that illogical 
     gibberish.
     
     Regards,
     David

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Gandy for President
Author:  leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us at Internetmail
Date:    10/15/97 8:51 PM


> 
> You see, to be a REAL Leica, it has to be among the very best of the 
> very best.
     
Right.  And, IMO, the SL2 meets this standard equally as well as the M6. It 
was too good to be profitable.
     
Chuck
- --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Chuck Warman     
cwarman@wf.net    (Wichita Falls, TX)