Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/07/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Hi Patrick,
I tried it on my SL and R4 last night in success. I thought it
should have the same kind of mount as the other R lenses. The lens
was lighter than I thought. I think I really like it if the glass
quality is excellent enough.
Thanks,
David
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Telyt-R 400/6.8
Author: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us at Internetmail
Date: 7/2/97 3:43 PM
From: seungmin@luxmail.luxcom.com
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 97 13:42:47 PST
Hi John,
Thank you for your info. I have the box marked 11960 for R.
I believe that it comes complete with the tube. Did you mean
that 11906 for R has the same lens mount as the normal 2 or 3
cam lenses? It is my belief that it is complete with the tube
(11906). I have the original box and leather case too. Also
the owner said he used it several times on Leicaflex SL.
If I remember correctly, the 400/6.8 does not have an automatic
diaphragm, so there will be no coupling cam on it. You have to meter
stopped down. That would make the mount look a little
different... but it wouldn't make it look like an M or Visoflex mount.
If you have an R camera, have you tried fitting the lens to the R
body? If it has a smaller bayonet mount, then it is the Visoflex lens
and you will need the adapter. If it fits, you're in business.
I was also at the San Mateo show and saw a couple of 400/6.8's, at
least one of which had a Viso mount on it. Let's hope you haven't
been taken for a ride by an unscrupulous vendor.
- -Patrick