Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/05/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
- --IMA.Boundary.075005268
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: cc:Mail note part
Harold,
I had sticky frames in my M4-P. It cost me $125 to have Don Goldberg
fix it (he's very good, and it took him 2 tries to do it!)
This may open up the old debate reagrading whether or not M4-2's &
M4-P's are of lower build quality than M6's, and all of these aren't
as well built as earlier M's. We could also talk about steel gears
versus brass, zinc bodies versus brass, Canada versus Wetzlar versus
Solms...
Or we could go and make photographs instead.
Alistair
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________ Subject: Re: Sticky frames problem
Author: ted grant <75501.3002@CompuServe.COM> at Internet Date:
5/1/97 10:39 AM
Harold wrote:
<<<Now, what I wanted to find out is, is this a common problem with
the M4P, is ther an easy solution, and does it occur often with the M6
(as I'm considering buying one of those).>>>>>>
Hi Harold,
Not knowing where you are in the world, USA - Canada or what country,
here are a couple of things:
1/ I've never encountered your frameline sticking at any time nor
have I heard of it. I have had at most times in hand as working
cameras, three M4's, M4p's or now 3 M6's and none have given me any
thing along these conditions. If you are in the USA I'd send it to
Leica Camera Inc in Northvale, New Jersey and ask that Ernst Hartmann
look at it.
Leica Camera Inc.
156 Ludlow Ave.,
Northvale, NJ 07647
201-767-7500
2/ If you are in Canada, send it to:
Kinndermann (Canada) Inc.
361 Steelcase Road, Unit 3,
Markham, ON L3R 3V8
PH.# 905-940-9262
The final option: trade it in before you spend anymore money on it
and get the M6. you wont be sorry, as it is a more efficient camera
because of the internal meter.
ted
Victoria, Canada
http://www.islandnet.com/~tedgrant
- --IMA.Boundary.075005268
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name="RFC822 message headers"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: cc:Mail note part
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="RFC822 message headers"
Received: from ns2.baxter.com (159.198.1.38) by ccmailgw.mcgawpark.baxter.com
with SMTP
(IMA Internet Exchange 2.1 Enterprise) id 000DC463; Thu, 1 May 97 10:15:26
- -0500
Received: from mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [192.147.236.1]) by
ns2.baxter.com (8.8.0/8.8.0) with ESMTP id KAA21341 for <stewara@baxter.com>;
Thu, 1 May 1997 10:20:29 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us id AA02167; Thu, 1 May 97 07:48:39 -0700
Received: by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us id AA02161; Thu, 1 May 97 07:48:36 -0700
Received: from WCBC-Message_Server by tmhe.com
with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 01 May 1997 09:29:13 -0500
Message-Id: <s3686269.096@tmhe.com>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 4.1
Date: Thu, 01 May 1997 09:29:21 -0500
From: Greg Reddick <greg.reddick@tmhe.com>
To: jim@brick.org, leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Alpa help -Reply
Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
- --IMA.Boundary.075005268--