Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/12/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Hi David,
I also heard a lot about poor 28-70. It sounds like it is a black
sheep of the Leica family.
When it comes to 35-70, I know there are two versions with filter
size of E60 and E67. E60 is the first generation made in Japan
(possibly by Minolta) followed by E67 made in Germany. I have noticed
the price difference in the same condition was significant. I am sure
design is different but wonder if the difference would be worth the
price difference. In other words, I wonder if I have to pay that much
more money for Germany over Japan. If the newer design is better, is
the difference noticeable? This is sort of a question about German
made versus Japan made.
Regards,
David
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Angenieux
Author: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us at Internetmail
Date: 12/18/96 7:14 PM
At 01:24 PM 18/12/96 -0800, someone wrote:
<snip>
>The [Leica] 35-70 is supposed to be an amzing zoom lens.
Indeed it is. I have trouble telling it's photos from those of my 90mm
Sumicron!
>I believe that most, if not all of the lenses built by other
>companies for the different Leica systems were built to Leica
>specifications, so theoretically they should all be excellent quality
>lenses, whether this is true in practice is another question.
The only one I've heard not-so-good things about is the new, low-cost
28~70mm (supposedly built by Tamron[?]) - again, presumably to Leica specs.
Does anybody have some first-hand experience with this lens?
Best Wishes for a great holiday and a happy, healthy and prosperous New Year
to you all.
David.