Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/12/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
> The difference in optical formulation can be determined by comparing a
> collapsible to a non-collapsible version: the rigid one is five or ten
> millimeters longer. This has been a subject of hot debate, as Leica never
> discussed it, though they have different patent numbers -- I guess I should
> run down the patents and write this up for LHSA.
>
> Marc
>
Hello Marc,
I cheked it and (off course) you are right.
The front element is about 5mm closer to the filmplane compared to a
summicron NF, but also the rear element is closer to the filmplane.
Why wouldn't leica discuss this?
Greetings,
Michiel.