Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/12/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Quite simply, they are inexpensive because there are so many of them. It is
a fine lens. I use one from 1949 on my IIIf and IIIg. Someday I will buy a
collapsible one in M mount for my M cameras.
kw
>Why is the Elmar 90/4 so inexpensive used? Was this lens an
>unimpressive performer? Can anyone compare it directly to the Jupiter
>85/2? On the Kiev page (http://users.aol.com/kievrpt/35rf.htm), all
>these ex-Soviet LTM lenses show up with surprisingly low resolution
>numbers in line pairs/mm, yet I hear great things about them. Were
>the old Elmars sharper than the new Jupiters at equivalent apertures?
>
>(Those who know me as an inveterate Leica R user may be surprised by
>this question about a rangefinder lens, but today my wife surprised me
>by giving me an M2 as an early Christmas gift. I'd been mooning over
>this camera ever since first handling it a few weeks ago. I had been
>shopping for a cheap thread-mount rangefinder, but the film advance
>just felt so wonderful... the finder was so clear and bright... well,
>I just got it bad. Happily my wife, sweetheart that she is, took pity
>on me.)
- ----
Ken Wilcox Carolyn's Personal Touch Portraits
LHSA, MEA, LAW preferred---> <wilcox@umcc.umich.edu>
<kwilcox@genesee.freenet.org>