Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/04/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
The CLE has exposure compensation facility.
Pablo
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: CLE vs. Leica
Author: joe@azurite.demon.co.uk at @UCSD
Date: 11/04/1996 8:41 PM
In message <199604111639.JAA23564@dfw-ix4.ix.netcom.com>, Stephen Gandy
<cameras@ix.netcom.com> writes
>It's the currently the only way to get aperture priority automation
>with Leica lenses. It has an accurate electronic shutter and
>metering system which..alas..does not work when the batteries
>die. It's only design fault is that the meter does not
>function when the camera is switched off AE priority.
Am I right in thinking that the CLE has no exposure lock or exposure
compensation facility? If so, wouldn't this make getting accurate
exposures on slide film a bit difficult?
--
joe b.
>-- Saved internet headers (useful for debugging)
>Received: from UCSD.EDU by mail.ucsd.edu; id PAA15412 sendmail 8.6.12/UCSD-2.2-
>Received: from mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [192.147.236.1] (mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [19
>Received: by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us id AA00212; Thu, 11 Apr 96 14:37:49 -0700
>Received: by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us id AA00191; Thu, 11 Apr 96 14:37:22 -0700
>Received: from post.demon.co.uk ([158.152.1.72]) by relay-2.mail.demon.net
>Received: from azurite.demon.co.uk ([158.152.206.50]) by relay-3.mail.demon.net
>Message-Id: <kj3llBBNBWbxEwjW@azurite.demon.co.uk>
>Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 20:41:01 +0100
>To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>From: "joe b." <joe@azurite.demon.co.uk>
>Subject: Re: CLE vs. Leica
>In-Reply-To: <199604111639.JAA23564@dfw-ix4.ix.netcom.com>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>X-Mailer: Turnpike Version 1.11 <o1driLLSWkkwIdz7lucp4Q5JGm>
>Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us