Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/08/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Thinking about a D700 or D7000
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:36:30 -0400

CF cards seem more serious to me. The seem more like what a card should be.
A big boy card. Those little SD cards are to me l like AAA batteries.  Give
me an AA any day. But when compactness really is an issue they both seem to
be the answer. I often feel more comfortable with non micro engineering.. I
like some space in my components. Room to work under the hood. I should not
have to have my glasses on to even see the thing.
-- 
Mark R.



> From: "Henning J. Wulff" <henningw at archiphoto.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 17:29:23 -0700
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Thinking about a D700 or D7000
> 
> That's been my experience as well. I prefer SD cards.
> 
> As for read/write speeds, they're quite equivalent. SD cards were faster 
> for a
> couple of years, but CF cards seem to have caught up. For similar size and
> performance though CF cards seem to be more expensive, probably because SD
> sales are many times that of CF cards.
> 
> 
> On 2011-08-14, at 2:56 AM, Marty Deveney wrote:
> 
>> I've had a lot of problems with CF cards and readers, but never with
>> SD.  Sample size is low, but my bad luck has always been with CF.
>> 
>> Marty
>> 
>> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:07 AM, J. Newell <john.o.newell at comcast.net> 
>> wrote:
>>> In theory, that's right, but how often do you read reports of bent/broken
>>> pins? In contrast, reports of physical/electrical failures in SD card
>>> cameras and readers are surprisingly common.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> John
>>> 
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Marty Deveney" <benedenia at gmail.com>
>>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2011 9:38:19 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Thinking about a D700 or D7000
>>> 
>>> The readers for CF cards, being multi-pin, are easier to damage, as
>>> are the the in-camera connections. If you bend or snap a pin,
>>> everything is ruined. I have had a reader that broke and caused me
>>> considerable grief, but I eventually recovered the files. SD cards
>>> have a sliding contact and there are no fine parts that can get bent
>>> or break.
>>> 
>>> Marty
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:39 PM, J. Newell <john.o.newell at 
>>> comcast.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>> CF cards have faster write speeds but are physically larger and tend to 
>>>> be
>>>> more expensive than SD cards. Not relevant for most users, they also 
>>>> have a
>>>> higher potential capacity.
>>>> For the fumble-fingered, they're harder to drop. ;-)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> As a non-technical impression, I read tons of posts about problems with 
>>>> SD
>>>> cards and don't remember the last time I read about a CF card problem, 
>>>> but
>>>> that's just impression, not science.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> John Newell
>>>> 
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Frank Filippone" <red735i at earthlink.net>
>>>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
>>>> Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2011 8:34:13 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Thinking about a D700 or D7000
>>>> 
>>>> Question on the type of memory card used...
>>>> 
>>>> Is there any advantage to a CF card relative to a SD card? Vice versa?
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, I realize one card is smaller than the other... but I wonder why
>>>> Nikon ( for one) uses CF cards in some cameras, and SD cards in 
>>>> others.....
>>>> 
>>>> Frank Filippone
>>>> Red735i at earthlink.net
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: lug-bounces+red735i=earthlink.net at leica-users.org
>>>> [mailto:lug-bounces+red735i=earthlink.net at leica-users.org] On Behalf 
>>>> Of A.
>>>> Lal
>>>> Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2011 12:54 AM
>>>> To: Leica Users Group
>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Thinking about a D700 or D7000
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> I have also looked into the D700, which seems to be unfortunately very
>>>>> hard to find in dealers shelves, outside of the >occasional demo.
>>>> 
>>>> Rumours are that the D700 is no longer being made and will be replaced 
>>>> by a
>>>> 24MP FF model later this month.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> 
> Henning Wulff
> henningw at archiphoto.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




In reply to: Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Thinking about a D700 or D7000)