Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/03/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think I'm reasonably well qualified to offer you a view on this because, among other things, I own and use? a D100,?a n R-D1,? a D200 and a large pile of Leica M, Leica R and Nikon F gear. The comparison of the D100 and the R-D1 is better than some might think.? They?use the same sensor.? Neither is what I'd call pro or even prosumer build.? Both are capable of producing extremely good images if good technique and good lenses are used.? The weakest link IME with the D100 is a painfully slow write speed and small cache, so it is a poor choice for things like sports photography.? The R-D1 isn't much better.? The weakest link with the R-D1 is the fragile RF adjustment, which is user-adjustable but can be frustrating to keep up with. An R-D1 will probably cost you anywhere from $1k to $1400 depending on condition, etc. (haven't checked prices lately).? You can probably buy a D100 for $200-300 in very clean condition, which leaves a fair bit of money for lenses.? Some of the Nikon consumer zooms are surprisingly sharp and contrasty but often have relatively slow variable apertures and various distortion issues (which may or may not be a big issue, depending on what you're photographing).? Many will also be DX format and/or G-type (no manual aperture control) - might not be an issue if you don't spend too much and/or don't plan to get into full-frame sensor DSLRs any time soon. If you want to sort out Nikon hardware (digital and film), Thom Hogan's website has all kinds of reviews, as well as concise guides/opinions on packages ( www.bythom.com ).? Can't help on Canon but I'm sure others will jump in. If it were my money, I'd probably find a cheap, clean D100 or Canon equivalent and a couple of zooms (wide/normal and normal/tele) and chalk it up to T&E. YMMV; good luck.? The thing about digital is, as you say, that at this point any given camera spends a very short time at the top of the technocurve.? The good thing is that the "outdated" models often become relatively affordable and can produce very good results if you're not trying to cover the wall at Grand Central. John Newell