Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/03/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] state of my world
From: reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid)
Date: Sat Mar 8 13:49:40 2008
References: <C2D4A0FE3756911CFA7D59B1@hindolveston.reid.org> <003e01c8813a$4fd9a8d0$ef8cfa70$@net> <4276FFE022B9DBCDFA82F0E0@hindolveston.reid.org> <3C2C3ACB-61BB-44E9-ACA4-CAF3E2AB6ECE@aotera.org>
> leica-users.org does not have a secondary MX
After several decades in the computer operations business I have reached the
conclusion that secondary MXs are a bad idea. They just increase the number
of places that you have to look for lost mail, and they create rarely-used
flow paths that increase the burden of operating the whole network. I'd
rather queue the mail upstream than at a secondary.
In reply to:
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] state of my world)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] state of my world)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] state of my world)
Message from scheng at aotera.org (Spencer Cheng) ([Leica] state of my world)