Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/05/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Rei, I'm not sure that one or even two failures constitutes a design flaw. I would lean toward a bad casting at this point. Gene -------------- Original message from Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com>: -------------- > that's kind of horrifying to see the metal housing of the m8 > fail so catastrophically. i guess the design is faulty; > the front-back split effectively means that the baseplate > sort of hooks into a lower corner of the front piece. a > one-peice design would not fail in this manner. > > it's hard to imagine there was much stress on a tripod--the > lens it was mounting was only a 50 lux, rather than > a heavy noctilux or 75 lux. > > at least the lens didn't look like it was damaged in the fall > > -rei > > On May23 19:00, Robert D. Baron wrote: > > This report on the LUF regarding failure of the base of an M8 is perhaps > > of some concern: > > > > > http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/leica-m8-forum/25121-base-plate-failur > > e.html > > > > or > > > > http://tinyurl.com/2m9kdx > > > > I am not a metallurgist nor do I play one on tv. I have no idea if this > > is a rare event or something to fret over. > > > > I looked at my own base and it looks fine (solid, it appears) but what > > do I know? > > > > > > > > --Bob > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > -- > Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com > Ridgewood, New Jersey > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information