Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/04/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Rigby pinhole cameras
From: Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:38:47 -0700
References: <1120AB2026ABD211A82600A024B97137C08F@einstein.morton.org.uk>

At 01:12 PM 4/18/01 -0400, Martin Howard wrote:
>leica@davidmorton.org jotted down the following:
>
>> It doesn't matter *how*many times I tell myself that 5x4 is more sensible
>> because I have a Polaroid back and could use Type 55, that 10x8 is calling
>> me...
>
>11x14" pinhole.  Or 12x20".  Now *that* would be cool.
>
>M.


Polaroid makes 20x24 instant material...  Why think small!

Jim

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Rigby pinhole cameras)
In reply to: Message from leica@davidmorton.org ([Leica] Rigby pinhole cameras)